The UCP government passed Bill 1; is protest illegal?

Yesterday, the Alberta government passed Bill 1, otherwise known as Critical Infrastructure Defence Act. Here’s what you need to know.

Yesterday, the Alberta government held the third reading of and ultimately passed Bill 1, otherwise known as Critical Infrastructure Defence Act.

The following 36 MLAs were the only ones present in the house for the vote:

  • Aheer
  • Amery
  • Barnes
  • Ceci
  • Dreeshen
  • Ellis
  • Ganley
  • Glasgo
  • Hanson
  • Horner
  • Irwin
  • Issik
  • Kenney
  • Loewen
  • Lovely
  • Luan
  • Milliken
  • Neudorf
  • Nielsen
  • Orr
  • Pancholi
  • Pitt
  • Rehn
  • Reid
  • Rosin
  • Rowswell
  • Rutherford
  • Sawhney
  • Schmidt
  • Schulz
  • Schweitzer
  • Sigurdson, R.J.
  • Singh
  • Smith
  • Wilson
  • Yaseen

Only 6 MLAs present voted against passing the bill: Ceci, Ganley, Irwin, Nielsen, Pancholi, and Schmidt.

Support independent journalism

Bill 1 is designed to make it illegal to protest what the UCP government calls essential infrastructure.

What is essential infrastructure?

So, the bill lists 16 kinds of infrastructure as essential:

  1. Controlled area, installation, manufacturing plant, marketing plant, pipeline, processing plant, refinery, road or road allowance as defined in the Pipeline Act
  2. Heavy oil site, mine, oil production site, oil sands site, pit, private utility, privately owned development, quarry, storm drainage system, telecommunication line, transmission line, waste management facility, wastewater system, watercourse or waterworks system as defined in the Environmental Protection and Enhancement Act
  3. Provincial highway, transportation facility, transportation system or urban rail transit system as defined in the Highways Development and Protection Act
  4. Railway, structural facility or track as defined in the Railway (Alberta) Act
  5. Hydro development or power plant as defined in the Hydro and Electric Energy Act
  6. Agricultural operation as defined in the Agricultural Operation Practices Act
  7. Highway as defined in the Traffic Safety Act
  8. Facility as defined in the Oil and Gas Conservation Act
  9. Public utility as defined in the Public Utilities Act
  10. Electric utility as defined in the Electric Utilities Act
  11. Gas utility as defined in the Gas Utilities Act
  12. Coal processing plant as defined in the Coal Conservation Act
  13. Oil sands processing plant as defined in section 2(2)(pp) of the Activities Designation Regulation (AR 276/2003)
  14. Radio apparatus as defined in the Radiocommunication Act (Canada), including its antenna systems
  15. Dam as defined in the Water (Ministerial) Regulation (AR 205/98)
  16. Building, structure, device or other thing prescribed by the regulations

A lot, right? Most them are self explanatory, but I linked to each of the acts so you can read their official definitions, which typically follow after the table of contents. I was going to parse out the definitions here, but after I got through the first two types, it was getting pretty long.

Keep in mind, however, that not all definitions are self-explanatory. Take highways, for example. It’s not what we typically think of when we hear the word. The Traffic Safety Act defines highway as:

any thoroughfare, street, road, trail, avenue, parkway, driveway, viaduct, lane, alley, square, bridge, causeway, trestleway, or other place or any part of any of them, whether publicly or privately owned, that the public is ordinarily entitled or permitted to use for the passage or parking of vehicles

It’s pretty expansive and includes city streets, not just rural highways.

Anyhow, in addition to all the infrastructure types I listed above, Bill 1 includes the land upon which any of them are located or used in connection with them.

What are we not allowed to do?

Now that we know what the essential infrastructure is, what are we not allowed to do with them? Well, according to section 2, it comes down to 3 main actions:

  1. Enter on essential infrastructure
  2. Damage or destroy essential infrastructure
  3. Obstruct, interrupt, or interfere with the construction, maintenance, use, or operation of essential infrastructure

There are a couple of disclaimers.

First, all of these actions have to be willful. You won’t be found guilty, apparently, if it was accidental.

Second, you also won’t be found guilty if you committed any of these actions with “lawful right, justification, or excuse”.

Also, you can be found guilty of committing an offence if you aid, counsel, or direct someone else to perform any of those 3 actions, regardless of whether they actually follow through with it.

Section 2 also makes it illegal for someone to gain legitimate access to essential infrastructure but under false pretences.

What are the consequences?

Section 3 says that for a single person, the first offence can result in a fine between $1,000.00 and $10,000.00, up to 6 months in jail, or both. For a second offence at the same location, the fine is between $10,000.00 and $25,000.00; jail time is the same.

For a corporation, the fine is between $10,000.00 and $200,000.00. And officers of the corporation can be liable for the penalties.

Also, every day someone performs any of the 3 actions I listed above counts as a separate offence. I interpret that as meaning, for example, that if I protest at a pipeline for 5 days, I can be fined as much as $110,000.00 and spend 2.5 years in jail.

The 2 final sections

Section 4 basically says that people can be arrested without a warrant, and Section 5 that the lieutenant governor can append the list of essential infrastructure to include in the future other “buildings, structures, devices, or other things”.

So what does it all mean?

Well, obviously, it covers such things as environmentalists stopping pipeline construction and vegans protesting on turkey farms. But it goes further than that.

For example, as I already indicated, 1(1)(a)(vii) identifies a parking lot as essential infrastructure. 2(1) says that no one can enter a parking lot without “lawful right, justification, or excuse”.

So if I want to gather in a parking lot with—I don’t know—50 other people to hold signs picketing a recent government action, does that count as “lawful right, justification, or excuse”? Who decides? The peace officer who arrests us? The judge after we’ve been arrested?

Remember, 2(1) prohibits simply entering essential infrastructure. Just being there is an offence. You don’t need to damage anything or prevent anyone from doing their job. You could just be assembling peacefully, but if some undetermined person considers your “right, justification, or excuse” unlawful, you can be arrested.

And if it’s illegal to direct someone to enter that parking lot, does that mean it’s illegal to create a Facebook event for that protest?

Speaking of peaceful assembly, Section 2(c) of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms guarantees that everyone has the fundamental freedom of peaceful assembly. 2(b) guarantees us the freedom of expression and communication through our signs, and 2(d) guarantees us freedom to associate with others.

In full disclosure, I’m no constitutional lawyer, but in my unprofessional assessment, Bill 1 has the potential to infringe on some people’s constitutional freedoms.

And right as the government keeps cutting jobs, raising our cost of living, ruining our health care, and destroying our educational system. We’re stuck with them for another 3 years—at least—and if they’re outlawing all protest, it’s going to be tough to hold them accountable.

Support independent journalism

By Kim Siever

Kim Siever is an independent queer journalist based in Lethbridge, Alberta. He writes daily news articles, focusing on politics and labour.

24 replies on “The UCP government passed Bill 1; is protest illegal?”

So in theory, Bill 1 allows police to arrest minors for drawing in chalk on their own driveways, correct? And skipping. And certainly for painting those Yellow Fish Road logos on public sidewalks. Looks like the city police will be swamped with calls about delinquent young offenders (aka Girl Guides and others) this summer. It makes sense that Jason Kenney would take a hard stand against these criminals. Bust into their homes and toss them in the slammer, Jason. These thugs have too much time on their hands!!! They should pay for this!!!

Infringe on some peoples constitutional rights. You mean like the Nazis Party of Kanada (Liebrals) confiscating legally owned property?

Last I checked currently owned weapons are grandfathered and the buyback was voluntary. So no, not like that. Now they to stay on topic.

You are so wrong. The legally owned property is not grandfathered, is too be confiscated and no offer of payment has been made. Is on topic, article talks about Conservatives infringing on “rights” just like his beloved Leftist Government.

Bye bye freedom bye bye democracy!
Hello oppression hello slavery!
Unfortunately the road to hell was paved with good intentions!
Or was it?!!

If you don’t like property (weapons) being confiscated, then yes, you probably should be MAJORLY upset that Kenney is going beyond that to actually infringe upon Charter rights. Weapons aren’t guaranteed by the charter (you have no constitutional rights to weapons – this is Canada, not the US). Peaceful protest is. Kenney’s action is worse than guns being taken, according to Canadian laws. In that case, what do you call Kenney and the UCP for violating constitutional rights?

Actually Karen you may be very wrong as the courts will decide. As firearms are legally obtained property they may be covered under the Charter of Rights, that is why there are currently several cases against the Liberal OIC. The Liberals have dissolved parliament with the help of the Liberal Apprentice Party (NDP) to enable them to try to bypass many of our rights & freedoms. I am not sure if I agree with this Bill but whether it is constitutional or not will ultimately be up to the courts. As a final thought no it isn’t worse then guns being taken away,

Where is this picture from? It certainly does not resemble any police pic from Alberta. A bill protecting infrastructure from vandalism and/or obstruction does nothing to curtail our freedom of speech and protest. Get off the bandwagon, stop exaggerating and get real!

The problem, Lorraine, is that there were already laws in place to protect infrastructure from vandalism. This law goes beyond that. What it does is threaten Charter rights, like freedom of association. Yes, it does threaten our democratic right to gather publicly to express our dissent.This law was not necessary, because other laws already existed to do what this one was supposedly designed to do. Not only is this law an extra layer of unnecessary red tape, it overreaches its supposed intent. No warrants? What is this, Lorraine, a police state? We only need to look at what is happening in cities south of the border to understand how this law can be abused by authorities. Surely it will face a challenge in the Supreme Court of Canada. There is also a possibility that Jason Kenney will invoke the notwithstanding clause, which he is fond of mentioning from time to time. Is this the thin edge of his wedge? The Charter of Rights and Freedoms was designed for times like these, to protect us from people like Jason Kenney, who threaten our democracy. Be careful what you wish for, in wishing away your rights. Don’t expect special treatment when they are gone. And stop gaslighting those who are not eager to let our rights and freedoms lapse. We still have the right to protect what the Charter guarantees us, and we will.

The link you provided below is for Bill 1 of last year, repealing the carbon tax. The bill discussed in the article has not yet received royal assent, and as such hasn’t come into law yet, This article’s Bill 1 timeline can be found here:

It is very sad that only 36 MLA’s out of 87 showed up to vote. Its time that MLA’s are held accountable for their time. What were they doing to not show up to vote. Alberta you are in a sad state of affairs.

Everybody needs to organize a huge rally storming his property pounding on his door and protesting right in his ephin face while his family is in the background watching. F#%k this piece of sh/t

Comment on this story

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: