Is it true that oil and gas is Alberta’s largest industry?

Last week, Alberta’s energy minister, sent out a tweet in which she claimed that the oil and gas sector is the largest industry in Alberta. But what does that mean?

Last week, Sonya Savage, Alberta’s energy minister, sent out a tweet in which she claimed that the oil and gas sector is the largest industry in Alberta.

It wasn’t clear what she meant by “largest”—number of employees? amount of tax revenue generated?

Support independent journalism

Well, I already discovered that oil and gas doesn’t employ the most employees. I also found that they don’t produce the most government revenue. So then I wondered if she was referring to gross domestic product.

Otherwise known as GDP, it’s the value of all the finished goods and services produced within a specific timeframe.

For example, Alberta’s GDP for 2019 was $337.15 billion. That means that if you add up all the goods and services produced last year in Alberta, it comes out to over $337 billion.

Here’s a breakdown by sector:

Industry2019 GDP
Mining, quarrying, and oil and gas extraction$87.88
Real estate and rental and leasing$34.82
Health care and social assistance$19.24
Professional, scientific and technical services$16.52
Transportation and warehousing$16.03
Public administration$15.54
Wholesale trade$14.11
Retail trade$13.65
Finance and insurance$13.14
Educational services$12.46
Administrative and support, waste management and remediation services$8.33
Information and cultural industries$7.52
Accommodation and food services$6.92
Other services (except public administration)$6.36
Agriculture, forestry, fishing and hunting$6.22
Arts, entertainment and recreation$1.80
Management of companies and enterprises$1.65

Clearly, mining, quarrying, and oil and gas extraction (I’m just going to abbreviate it to oil and gas from now on since the vast majority of the sector is oil and gas, and it takes less time for my arthritic fingers to type) produced more than any other single sector of Alberta’s economy last year.

And nearly $90 billion is a good chunk of change, to be sure. I wonder what percentage of the total GDP that is.

Mining, quarrying, and oil and gas extraction26.07%
Real estate and rental and leasing10.33%
Health care and social assistance5.71%
Professional, scientific and technical services4.90%
Transportation and warehousing4.75%
Public administration4.61%
Wholesale trade4.19%
Retail trade4.05%
Finance and insurance3.90%
Educational services3.70%
Administrative and support, waste management and remediation services2.47%
Information and cultural industries2.23%
Accommodation and food services2.05%
Other services (except public administration)1.89%
Agriculture, forestry, fishing and hunting1.84%
Arts, entertainment and recreation0.54%
Management of companies and enterprises0.49%

So, yeah, $87.88 billion does seem a lot. But $248.30 billion seems like more. That’s what the other sectors combined created.

Sonya’s right. Oil and gas is technically our largest single economic sector. But the majority of our economic production is outside oil and gas. Like, the rest of the economy outputs roughly 3 times as much as oil and gas does.

I wonder if it’s always been like this. After all, we still haven’t recovered fully from the 2015 recession. So, I found a dataset going back to 1997, and here’s what it looks like charted.

Yep. Oil and gas seems to have been the single largest sector of the economy for decades. And it’s GDP keeps growing, too, which seems even more impressive.

But what if we showed it in proportion to total GDP.

So, that’s interesting. Even though the previous chart seemed to make it look like GDP in the oil and gas sector is booming, this seems to indicate that as a share of total GDP, it’s actually worsened a bit over the years.

In 1997, the oil and gas sector made up 33% of all gross domestic product. However, in the 22 years since then, it’s never been at that level again, let alone higher than it. In fact, it’s never been above 29% since the 1990s, with the lowest proportion getting down to 22.6%, a full 10 point drop. The average over the last 20 years as been only 25%. That means that over the last two decades, 75% of Alberta’s annual GDP, on average, occurred outside of oil and gas.

Now, because the oil and gas sector produces the most of any sector, it probably generates the most corporate income tax revenue, right?

% of GDP% of tax
Mining, quarrying, and oil and gas extraction26.07%4.14%
Real estate and rental and leasing10.33%7.18%
Health care and social assistance5.71%3.51%
Professional, scientific and technical services4.90%5.42%
Transportation and warehousing4.75%5.86%
Public administration4.61%0.01%
Wholesale trade4.19%11.82%
Retail trade4.05%4.71%
Finance and insurance3.90%16.98%
Educational services3.70%0.08%
Administrative and support, waste management and remediation services2.47%1.44%
Information and cultural industries2.23%2.85%
Accommodation and food services2.05%0.89%
Other services (except public administration)1.89%1.78%
Agriculture, forestry, fishing and hunting1.84%2.17%
Arts, entertainment and recreation0.54%0.21%
Management of companies and enterprises0.49%6.96%

Hmmm. Not quite. Mining, quarrying, and oil and gas extraction combined came in 1st place for economic production last year but only 10th place for generating corporate income tax revenue for the province. If you separate the two sectors, then oil and gas falls to 12th place, meaning more sectors produced more corporate tax revenue last year than oil and gas, compared to those who produced less.

For example, the manufacturing sector (the largest payer of corporate income tax) generated 4 times as much in corporate tax revenue last year than oil and gas did, yet oil and gas generated 3.5 times more GDP.

Finance and insurance paid more than 2 times as much in corporate income tax revenue than oil and gas, yet oil and gas produced nearly 9 times more economic value. And again, that’s if oil and gas is combined with mining and quarrying.

Heck the “management of companies and enterprises” sector generated nearly 7% of the total corporate income tax collected last year, but participated in less than half a percent to economic output.

But—you may interject—oil and gas have to pay royalties. If you add that to the corporate income tax revenue, they pay even more.

Well, you have a point there. After all, royalty revenue hit $5.937 billion last year.

However, royalty rates aren’t a tax.

You see, the non-renewable resources that oil and gas companies extract from the ground (bitumen, oil, natural gas, coal, etc) are public resources. They belong to the public: to you and to me. We collectively “own” them (as far as anyone can own anything that was here before were).

Corporations shouldn’t be able to come into a territory and extract publicly-owned resources for free. If the public is going to allow them to extract that publicly-owned resource for profit, then the public should be reimbursed for that.

Royalty rates are input costs for a company. Just like a textile company pays for bales of cotton or a vegan burger company pays for bushels of peas.

Alberta is the supplier of the oil, and the bitumen, and the natural gas, and the coal. We, the people, are the supplier; the provincial government simply manages it for us, so we don’t have to. And as the supplier, we’re entitled to charge our customers for the products we sell them.

That $5.937 billion isn’t a tax to corporations. It’s an expense. Like worker wages, or equipment, or utilities, or printer paper.

Just because the government happens to be the supplier doesn’t mean it’s a tax. Just because the supplier of one of your costliest expenses happens to be a government doesn’t entitle you to low tax rates.

And if you’re producing 25% of the province’s GDP, you should probably be paying more than 4% of its corporate income tax revenue.

Support independent journalism

By Kim Siever

Kim Siever is an independent queer journalist based in Lethbridge, Alberta. He writes daily news articles, focusing on politics and labour.

13 replies on “Is it true that oil and gas is Alberta’s largest industry?”

When corporate tax goes up, O&G companies leave. Simple, really. I look forward to tomorrow’s news article on that.

The corporate income tax rate under Ralph Klein was 15.5% at its highest rate, and small business taxes were at 6%. How many oil and gas companies left while he was in office?

Apples to Oranges

Oil Companies were making absolute bank in Alberta in the year 2000. Oil was picking up, the Canadian dollar was strong vs. the US dollar.

Now oil prices are low, the Canadian dollar is low, and Texas has close to 0% state taxes for these companies.

Oh, so you mean there’s more to companies leaving than just high corporate taxes?

Also, just to be clear, nowhere did I claim in this article that corporate taxes should increase.

What is the purpose of your last paragraph then, if not to make the point that you would argue O&G companies should pay more tax?

The purpose is to show the disconnect by how much they’re generating in economic activity and how much they’re generating in tax revenue. Saying that the proportion of the total corporate tax revenue that they pay should be closer to the proportion of the economic activity they generate is not the same things as saying that the corporate income tax rate should be higher for everyone.

Could you please make the % of GDP vs % of Tax in $ amount? Meaning $amount of GDP vs $ amount of Tax. Thanks,

Comment on this story

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: