The concept of real wages serves as a pivotal indicator of the material conditions of the working class within a capitalist society.
Real wages not only reflect the purchasing power of labour but also unveil the inherent contradictions and exploitation embedded within the capitalist mode of production.
Capitalism as a system is characterized by the exploitation of labour. The value of commodities is derived from the labour used to produce those commodities.
For example, grain has no economic value until it’s harvested by farm workers, cobalt has no economic value until it’s extracted by miners, trees have no economic value until they’re felled by lumberjacks, widgets have no economic value until they’re assembled by factory workers, and so on.
Despite workers being critical for creating the value in the products sold within the economy, under capitalism they are systematically alienated from the fruits of that labour. This alienation manifests itself in the form of surplus value—the difference between the value created by labour and the wages paid to the workers for that labour.
Real wages, therefore, represent a battleground where the interests of the owning class clash with those of the working class.
While nominal wages may increase over time, the true measure of economic well-being lies in real wages—the purchasing power of wages adjusted for inflation.
Capitalists, driven by the imperative of profit maximization, seek to minimize labour costs by exerting downward pressure on wages. This often entails outsourcing production to regions with lower labour costs or leveraging technologies to replace human labour with automation. As a result, despite increases in productivity, real wages stagnate or even decline, perpetuating the exploitation of the working class.
The owning class, driven by the pursuit of profit, are inherently inclined to resist any attempts by workers to assert their rights or demand higher wages. This antagonism between labour and capital forms the basis of class struggle, a perpetual conflict over the distribution of wealth and power within society.
Historically, moments of heightened class struggle, such as labour strikes or collective bargaining efforts, have often been accompanied by improvements in real wages and working conditions. However, these gains are often temporary, as capitalists deploy various tactics to undermine the bargaining power of workers and maintain their dominance over the means of production.
We must also consider the role of imperialism and globalization in shaping the dynamics of real wages on a global scale. The exploitation of underpaid labour in the Global South enables capitalists in the Global North to maintain artificially low real wages by outsourcing production to regions with lax labour regulations and dismal working conditions.
This global division of labour reinforces the unequal power dynamics inherent in capitalism, perpetuating the impoverishment of workers in the periphery to sustain the prosperity of capitalists in the core.
And the siloing of workers around the world, in trying to look out for only their own interest, while ignoring the needs of their fellow workers around the world—or even in their own community—undermines class solidarity, thereby weakening the bargaining power of the working class.
The concept of real wages serves as a lens through which we can analyze the inherent contradictions and exploitation within the capitalist mode of production.
By unveiling the mechanisms through which capitalists suppress wages and maximize profits, real wages underscore the urgent need for collective action and solidarity among the working class to challenge the structures of exploitation and strive towards a more equitable and just society.

181 replies on “What are real wages?”
[…] wages for these workers by only 4.25%, then it means these workers have been left with a cut to real wages of […]
[…] received only a 3.8% increase, while inflation passed the 24% mark, leaving them with a cut to real wages of […]
[…] trend is even more pronounced when we look at real wages, wages adjusted for […]
[…] a wage increase of only 6% during a period when inflation was over 24%, they ended up with a cut to real wages of […]
[…] during a period when inflation was 22.42%, they ended up going into bargaining with a cut to real wages of […]
[…] for these workers by only 4.25%, then it means these workers have been left with a cut to real wages of […]
[…] 3.75%. This means that by the end of the last contract, these workers ended up with a cut to their real wages—wages adjusted for inflation—of […]
[…] 21.17% during the period these workers got a combined wage increase of 4.25%, this left them with a real wage cut of […]
[…] that same period, inflation in Alberta increased by 22.42%, leaving these workers with a cut to real wages of 18.17% as they headed into negotiations on this new […]
[…] price index in Alberta rose 24.79%, which effectively turned that 6.75% raise into a cut to real wages of […]
[…] AUPE. During that same period, inflation had increased by 24.4%. These workers saw a cut to real wages of nearly 20% over 7 […]
[…] received only a 3.8% increase, while inflation passed the 24% mark, leaving them with a cut to real wages of […]
[…] 21.17%. When you account for the 4.25% combined wage increase, these workers ended up with a cut to real wages of […]
[…] it to say that a 3% wage increase over 2 years will be insufficient to make up real wage loss of over 14% over the last 4 years, especially when we factor in two more years of inflation […]
[…] during the same period that wages increased by just 9.14%, these workers ended up with a cut to real wages of 9.98% heading into […]
[…] collective agreements yet their wages increased just 4.25%, these workers were left with a cut to real wages of 16.92% heading into […]
[…] would leave them with a cut to real wages of over […]
[…] the same time that these workers (will have) received a 4.25% raise, they are left with a cut to real wages of […]
[…] the school division—think that an initial wage increase of just 1.25% would make up for a loss in real wages of over […]
[…] in crease of 9% during a period where inflation increased by 13.56%, they have received a cut to real wages of […]
[…] increase has risen by over 18%. Wages for these workers were already ridiculously low, but having a real wage that is 18% lower than it was nearly 5 years ago is […]
[…] be generous and include the additional 2% scheduled for 2024, however. It’s still a reduction in real wages, which is wages adjusted for […]
[…] these workers got a 1.7% wage reduction during a time of nearly 30% inflation. They had a loss in real wages of 31.14% heading into negotiations for their new […]
[…] that same period, they saw a combined wage increase of 20.25%, leaving the with a loss in real wages of 7.16%, or 2.83% if we account for compounded […]
[…] the same time these workers saw wages increase by only 8.25% (8.52%), they were left with a cut to real wages of 15.24% […]
[…] these workers got a 12% raise during a time of 17.55% inflation. They had a loss in real wages of 5.55% heading into negotiations for their new […]
[…] a 12.75% (13.47%) increase during a period that saw inflation at 20.10%, these workers had a cut to real wages of 7.87% (7.15%) by the end of their last […]
[…] two collective agreements, but their wages were increased by 11.25%, they were left with a cut to real wages of […]
[…] a 4.25% wage increase in the final 3 years, inflation rose by more than 22%, leaving them with a real wage cut of 18.17% heading into contract […]
[…] increased by over 17% during a time wages increased by only 6.5%, these workers has a cut to real wages of 10.65% by the time they got their last wage […]
[…] saw a wage increase of 12.6% during a period with 17.64% inflation, they ended up with a cut to real wages 5.04% heading into negotiations for the new […]