The concept of real wages serves as a pivotal indicator of the material conditions of the working class within a capitalist society.
Real wages not only reflect the purchasing power of labour but also unveil the inherent contradictions and exploitation embedded within the capitalist mode of production.
Capitalism as a system is characterized by the exploitation of labour. The value of commodities is derived from the labour used to produce those commodities.
For example, grain has no economic value until it’s harvested by farm workers, cobalt has no economic value until it’s extracted by miners, trees have no economic value until they’re felled by lumberjacks, widgets have no economic value until they’re assembled by factory workers, and so on.
Despite workers being critical for creating the value in the products sold within the economy, under capitalism they are systematically alienated from the fruits of that labour. This alienation manifests itself in the form of surplus value—the difference between the value created by labour and the wages paid to the workers for that labour.
Real wages, therefore, represent a battleground where the interests of the owning class clash with those of the working class.
While nominal wages may increase over time, the true measure of economic well-being lies in real wages—the purchasing power of wages adjusted for inflation.
Capitalists, driven by the imperative of profit maximization, seek to minimize labour costs by exerting downward pressure on wages. This often entails outsourcing production to regions with lower labour costs or leveraging technologies to replace human labour with automation. As a result, despite increases in productivity, real wages stagnate or even decline, perpetuating the exploitation of the working class.
The owning class, driven by the pursuit of profit, are inherently inclined to resist any attempts by workers to assert their rights or demand higher wages. This antagonism between labour and capital forms the basis of class struggle, a perpetual conflict over the distribution of wealth and power within society.
Historically, moments of heightened class struggle, such as labour strikes or collective bargaining efforts, have often been accompanied by improvements in real wages and working conditions. However, these gains are often temporary, as capitalists deploy various tactics to undermine the bargaining power of workers and maintain their dominance over the means of production.
We must also consider the role of imperialism and globalization in shaping the dynamics of real wages on a global scale. The exploitation of underpaid labour in the Global South enables capitalists in the Global North to maintain artificially low real wages by outsourcing production to regions with lax labour regulations and dismal working conditions.
This global division of labour reinforces the unequal power dynamics inherent in capitalism, perpetuating the impoverishment of workers in the periphery to sustain the prosperity of capitalists in the core.
And the siloing of workers around the world, in trying to look out for only their own interest, while ignoring the needs of their fellow workers around the world—or even in their own community—undermines class solidarity, thereby weakening the bargaining power of the working class.
The concept of real wages serves as a lens through which we can analyze the inherent contradictions and exploitation within the capitalist mode of production.
By unveiling the mechanisms through which capitalists suppress wages and maximize profits, real wages underscore the urgent need for collective action and solidarity among the working class to challenge the structures of exploitation and strive towards a more equitable and just society.

149 replies on “What are real wages?”
[…] Real wages are wages adjusted for inflation. Even though wages increased 22.42% over the last decade, because inflation was 27.71% these workers saw what amounts to effectively a wage cut of more than 5% during this period. […]
[…] means they’ll end up with a cut to real wages, which are wages adjusted for […]
[…] means that Alberta had the worst performance in real wages, which is wages adjusted for […]
[…] is a 13.42% reduction in real wages show these workers that the board values them? If they expect these workers to take a 13.42% wage […]
[…] 9 years, these workers end up with a wage increase of less than 9%. That results in a reduction in real wages, which is wages adjusted for […]
[…] workers increased by 4.75%, inflation grow by nearly 5 times that amount. That means that their real wages—wages adjusted for inflation—actually decreased by 17.94% during the same […]
[…] means that the workers have actually received a reduction in real wages—wages adjusted for inflation—of 5.7% since 2018. This employer has refused to offer their […]
[…] were getting a wage increase of just 2.25%, the cost of living jumped nearly 15%. That means their real wages—wages adjusted for inflation—decreased by […]
[…] to live with three years of wave freezes, the cost of living jumped nearly 15%. That means their real wages—wages adjusted for inflation—decreased by the same […]
[…] AUPE. During that same period, inflation has increased by 24.4%. These workers have seen a cut to real wages of nearly 20% over the last 7 […]
[…] risen nearly three times that amount. And that means that these workers are worse off in terms of real wages, which are wages adjusted for […]
[…] these workers accept this contract, they will likely receive a cut to their real wages—wages adjusted for inflation—by the time it expires in February […]
[…] inflation, we see that the combined 3.75% wage increase since 2016 ends up being a reduction in real wages—wages adjusted for inflation—of roughly […]
[…] 6.66% increase since December 2016, a 19.19% inflation ended up giving these workers a cut to their real wages—wages adjusted for inflation—of […]
[…] period, these workers received a 4% wage increase while inflation shot up by nearly 19%. That means real wages—wages adjusted for inflation—for these workers actually decreased by nearly […]
[…] a result, these workers have seen their real wages—wages adjusted for inflation—plummet by 11.75% in just the last 4 […]
[…] will have increased by 7.5%, inflation grow by more than triple that amount. That means that their real wages—wages adjusted for inflation—actually decreased by 17.76% during the same […]
[…] means real wages—wages adjusted for inflation—for these workers took a 6.28% […]
[…] means that the real wages—wages adjusted for inflation—for these workers have actually decreased by 20.55% since […]
[…] The workers’ bargaining team “expressed fury” to this “low offer”. Oestreich classified it as a wage reduction. […]
[…] means that these workers ended up with a cut to real wages—wages adjusted for inflation—of 11.83% heading into […]
[…] means that real wages—wages adjusted for inflation—for these workers actually had decreased by […]
[…] means that these workers in Lethbridge will have received a cut to real wages—wages adjusted for inflation—of […]
[…] means that the workers will end up with a cut to their real wages—which are wages adjusted for inflation—of […]
[…] addition, real wage growth for many workers has stagnated, failing to keep pace with the rising costs of living. […]
[…] workers came into negotiations with a cut to real wages—wages adjusted for inflation—of 8.82% but ended up with a 7.68% increase. That falls short of […]
[…] means that the workers will end up with a cut to real wages—wages adjusted for inflation—of 14.02% if the new contract goes into […]
[…] the same period. In fact, inflation was more than double the raise they got, leading to a cut in real wages—wages adjusted for inflation—of […]
[…] means that these workers ended up with a cut to real wages—wages adjusted for inflation—of 8.05% coming into […]
[…] means that these workers ended up with a cut to real wages—wages adjusted for inflation—of 14.43%. They were already nearly 14.5% behind inflation coming […]
[…] a result, they are heading into negotiations with a cut to real wages—wages adjusted for inflation—of 17.3%. No wonder the workers’ negotiating team is asking for […]
[…] we assume inflation over the next year will be 0%, the workers will still have seen a reduction in real wages—wages adjusted for inflation—of 16.83% and 18.83% since the summer of […]
[…] means the workers have seen a reduction in real wages—wages adjusted for inflation—of 21.88% since the summer of […]
[…] left the workers with a cut to real wages—wages adjusted for inflation—of 2.61% by the end of their last contract. The increases in the […]
[…] left the workers with a cut to real wages—wages adjusted for inflation—of 6.73% by the end of their last […]
[…] totalling 7.46%, inflation rose at nearly 3 times the rate! That leaves these workers with a cut to real wages—wages adjusted for inflation—of […]
[…] in first year of this new contract, these workers got a wage increase of just 2%. This is a cut to real wages—wages adjusted for inflation—of […]
[…] inflation was increasing by more than triple that amount. That has left these workers with a cut to real wages—wages adjusted for inflation—of […]
[…] inflation was increasing by nearly triple that amount. That has left these workers with a cut to real wages—wages adjusted for inflation—of […]
[…] these workers received a wage increase of just 6% (6.13%), it means these workers have had a cut to real wages—wages adjusted for inflation— 4.01% […]
[…] a result, these workers have received a cut to real wages—wages adjusted for inflation. And not a small one […]
[…] we apply the 25.06% inflation to those numbers, we end up with a real wage cut of 20.81% and […]
[…] at nearly triple the rate as wage increases. That means these workers have ended up with a cut to real wages—wages adjusted for inflation—of 17.58%. And that’s including the new 3.25% […]
[…] you account for both inflation and that single tiny wage increase, these workers have seen a cut to real wages—wages adjusted for inflation—of […]
[…] at more than double the rate as wage increases. That means these workers ended up with a cut to real wages—wages adjusted for inflation—of 8.9% going into […]
[…] means that real wages—wages adjusted for inflation—for these workers actually dropped by […]
[…] were receiving a 13.4% wage increase, inflation rose by 22.44%, leaving the workers with a cut to real wages—wages adjusted for inflation—of […]
[…] left these workers with a cut in real wages—wages adjusted for inflation—of 8.34% going into the new […]
[…] the 3.75% wage increase the workers received in their last contract, they ended up with a cut to real wages—wages adjusted for inflation—of 10.4% heading into this new round of […]
[…] in the final year of the contract, so these workers are even worse off than the 13% reduction in real wages during the last […]